This article is a qualitative research critique and ethical consideration essay. Study it to learn how to write qualitative research critiques and ethical consideration essays and gain insights into how you can get expert qualitative research critique and ethical consideration essay writing help.
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Example: The Assignment
- Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the ”Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1 ” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
- Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment. Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples.
- In a 1,000–1,250 word Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
- Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Research Critique Guidelines – Part I
Background of Study
- Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
- Discuss how these two articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
- Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
- State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are different Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples.
- Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.
Results of Study
- Summarize the key findings of each study in one or two comprehensive paragraphs.
- What are the implications of the two studies in nursing practice?
- Discuss two ethical considerations in conducting research.
- Describe how the researchers in the two articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples: The Essay Solution
The Study’s Introduction and Background
Multi-morbidity, or suffering from numerous chronic health disorders that need a variety of drugs to manage symptoms and avoid future problems, is more common among those aged 65 and over. The complexity of medical prescription in this unique patient group is typically increased by a combination of various healthcare demands, as well as age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes.
Inappropriate prescriptions are a prevalent clinical concern that affects the older population in primary nursing care. A large number of qualitative clinical research investigations have focused on this fact. Clyne et al. (2016) conducted a qualitative study to investigate this clinical problem as well as its underlying mechanisms from the perspective of general practitioners, after realizing that only a few studies have been designed to qualitatively explore the phenomenon of potentially inappropriate prescribing.
Their research sought to learn more about general practitioners’ attitudes on prescribing and the issue of improper prescriptions in senior primary nursing care patients. This was their primary research question and the subject of their qualitative investigation (Clyne et al, 2016). The authors demonstrated the study’s relevance by emphasizing the public health problems connected with incorrect medication in older individuals after identifying the research gap and problem.
The need to study the phenomenon of potentially inappropriate prescribing arises, according to Clyne et al (2016), from the commonly reported consequences of such practice in elderly people, such as an increase in morbidity, increased hospitalization, and lower health-related quality of life, as well as an increase in ADEs. Patients are also likely to encounter the healthcare risk of polypharmacy, according to the research. These medicines may also cause older people to fall, which may lead to further healthcare issues.
The research looks at a variety of potential questions. What is the rate of incorrect prescriptions among the elderly? What are the clinical or healthcare effects of incorrect prescribing? How can the issue be minimized as much as possible? Finally, the major emphasis of the research is on what clinicians think about the problem of possibly improper prescriptions.
The goal of the study article by Clyne et al (2016) is to investigate general practitioners’ perceptions on improper prescriptions and their effect on senior primary care patients. As their essay demonstrates, there is a strong link between the research questions and the study’s goal.
The authors used semi-structured qualitative interviews to investigate the perspectives of general practitioners in a randomized controlled trial aimed at reducing the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions in elderly patients, which would lead to the capstone project’s primary concern of elderly falls and associated comorbidities.
While their research focused on patients in Ireland who were 70 years or older, their choice of the quality approach was suitable since the study wanted to investigate general practitioners’ perspectives, which is a qualitative trait that may be further investigated utilizing the qualitative method.
The authors found a large number of qualitative and quantitative studies in the literature that were relevant to their study and the research’s topic, and that focused on the clinical problem of incorrect prescription and its effects, as well as possible therapies. The research is mostly based on peer-reviewed academic publications found in public sources like PubMed, Google Scholar, and PubMed Central.
The publications utilized in the research are mostly recent, however, the authors did rely on qualitative articles from 2003, which are still admissible under the qualitative criteria of article currency. The papers picked are very related to the study subject.
Despite the authors’ utilization of a wide variety of relevant peer-reviewed literature, there is little or no indication or discussion of the research’ possible flaws. However, in order to develop logical arguments and set out the outcomes of their research, the article’s literature analysis depended on proper data and information on the issue of incorrect prescription and its implications on the older population. Furthermore, despite the fact that their research was based on the OPTI-SCRIPT assessment procedure, the authors did not expressly establish a specific framework from the outcomes of their investigation.
Clyne et al. (2016) conducted seventeen semi-structured qualitative interviews with thirteen men and four women. The conclusions of their investigations indicated three key linked themes: a complicated prescription environment, paternalistic doctor-patient interactions, and the importance of possibly improper prescribing as a concept.
The study identified patient complexity, such as multimorbidity and polypharmacy, and prescriber complexity, such as the presence of multiple prescribers, restrictions in autonomy, and poor communication, as some of the main factors creating complexity in the prescribing setting, where there is a higher risk of potentially inappropriate prescription.
The research provides a significant contribution to nursing expertise on the subject of improper prescribing in the elderly. Its qualitative method was important to the nursing literature and body of knowledge because it allowed researchers to delve into the complicated clinical concerns of improper prescription in senior primary care in a way that most quantitative studies couldn’t.
The study identified a number of interrelated variables that influence the potential occurrence of inappropriate prescribing and older patient medication, which are important to nursing intervention and practice, such as the need to improve multi-morbidity and polypharmacy management, as well as a reduction in potentially inappropriate prescriptions and medications that could lead to such consequences as falling in older people.
The study’s results may be used in nursing education to enlighten general practitioners and clinicians about the importance of understanding the idea and procedures of possibly improper prescription Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples.
Considerations in Ethics
The Irish College of General Practitioners’ Research Ethics Committee gave Clyne et al (2016) ethical authority to perform their research. The participants were given written material and gave their agreement to participate in the study. Although there is no reason to dispute it, there is little evidence that patient privacy is protected.
Inappropriate medicine is a widespread concern among the elderly, and it has been related to an increase in the frequency of injurious and occasionally fatal falls among this vulnerable patient group in primary care. Clyne et al. (2016) conducted a clinically relevant qualitative study to identify factors that may influence the occurrence of this clinical problem, such as the prescription environment’s complexity, doctors’ paternalistic relationships with patients, and general practitioners’ lack of interest in this growing public health concern. As a result, further study is required to identify strategies that address the aforementioned issues and enhance senior nursing care.
Do not hesitate to contact our professionals at domyessayfast.com if you feel you need help with your qualitative research critique and ethical consideration essay assignment even after going through our essay example guide.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What are the ethical considerations in qualitative research?
Anonymity, confidentiality, and informed consent are three crucial ethical considerations to consider while doing qualitative research. The word ‘confidentiality,’ according to Richards and Schwartz, has varied implications for health care practitioners and researchers.
2. What are the critiques of qualitative research?
Qualitative research is sometimes attacked for being biased, small-scale, anecdotal, and/or lacking rigour; but, when done correctly, it is impartial, comprehensive, valid, dependable, believable, and rigorous.
3. Why are ethical considerations important for qualitative research?
To maintain the balance between the possible hazards of research and the expected benefits of research, ethical problems must be considered at all phases of qualitative research. Copyright may apply to the content.
Clyne, B., Cooper, J. A., Hughes, C. M., Fahey, T., & Smith, S. M. (2016). ‘Potentially inappropriate or specifically appropriate?’ Qualitative evaluation of general practitioners’ views on prescribing, polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people. BMC Family Practice, 17(1), 109